The best smart door locks pair dependable everyday access with entry methods and connectivity that suit your home. My best overall pick is the Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt for its built-in Wi-Fi and established deadbolt format, while the eufy Security Smart Lock C220 stands out for fingerprint access and the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE for buyers who want Matter over Thread. The main tradeoffs are whether you need a complete handle set, remote access without an added hub, or several ways to unlock the door. Fingerprint readers and keypads can make entry easier, but they also add setup, battery, and fit questions. Read on for the full breakdown, buying advice, and recommendations by household.
Get home appliances delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
The Schlage Encode is the strongest all-around fit for shoppers who want a familiar deadbolt design and built-in Wi-Fi rather than a lock centered only on local keypad access.
Fingerprint access separates several of the leading alternatives: the eufy C220, Wyze Lock Bolt v2, and Philips 4200 fingerprint models suit households that prefer a quick touch over remembering a code.
A handle set is a real selection factor in this lineup. Philips, Veise, and other handle-included options can simplify a coordinated replacement, but buyers should check door preparation and handing before choosing a bundle.
Connectivity is not interchangeable. Built-in Wi-Fi models favor remote access without a separate bridge, while the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s Matter over Thread approach is better suited to buyers already planning a compatible smart-home setup.
The lower-complexity options may be the better value for some homes. A keypad deadbolt or fingerprint knob can meet a narrower access need, but neither should be chosen without checking whether the existing door hardware and intended entry routine match its form.
| LOCKSTAR Smart Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Fingerprint, Keypad, App, Card, and Key Access |  | Best for Multiple Entry Options | Brand and model: LOCKSTAR LS-SDL | Lock type: Keypad deadbolt | Access methods: App, fingerprint, keypad code, card fob, traditional key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad |  | Best for Straightforward Installation | Brand and model: Yamiry YR01 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key; Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | App functions: Temporary access codes and unlock records | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart Door Lock with Handle, Fingerprint and Keypad, Satin Nickel |  | Best for Direct Wi-Fi Setup | Brand and model: Philips DDL242X-1HW | Finish: Satin nickel | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set with Fingerprint Keypad and Handle |  | Best for Temporary Guest Access | Brand and model: Philips DDL242X-1HW-H-NEW | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, passcode, backup key, Alexa, Google Assistant | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 Fingerprint Keyless Entry Deadbolt |  | Best for Broad Smart-Home Access | Brand and model: eufy Security T8506 | Lock type: Deadbolt | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt |  | Best for Multiple Entry Options | Model: WLCKB2 | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, keypad code, app, physical key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle |  | Best Complete Handle-and-Lock Set | Model: DDL242X-1HW-L | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Entry methods: Fingerprint and PIN code | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017G-H Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Handle Set, Matte Black |  | Best for High-Capacity Shared Access | Model: VE017G-H | Finish: Matte black | Access methods: Voice, fingerprint, app, codes, cards, backup key, user authorization, code sharing | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black |  | Best for Code Management | Model: BE489WBCEN622 | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi | Access codes: Up to 100 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yale Assure Lock 2 Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Keypad, Black Suede |  | Best for Hands-Free Access | Model: YRD410-WF1-BSP | Connectivity: 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Entry methods: Keypad, smartphone, Apple Watch, auto-unlock, backup key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Matter over Thread |  | Best for Flexible Access Methods | Access methods: Fingerprint, passcode, smartphone app, web portal, shared eKey or code, voice control, mechanical keys | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 | Passcode capacity: Up to 50 | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Keyless Entry |  | Best for High Code Capacity | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant | Connectivity: Built-in Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Door Knob Lock |  | Best Bluetooth Value | Model: YR05 | Material: Aluminum | Unlock methods: App, password, fingerprint, key fob, physical key | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt Lock Set with Handles |  | Best Complete Lock-and-Handle Set | Model: DDL240X-1HW-H2 | Unlock methods: App, fingerprint, PIN code, key, Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant | User codes: Up to 100 user codes and unlimited one-time PIN codes | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black |  | Best for Local Data Storage | Model: VE017 | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 Gateway, mechanical key | Fingerprint recognition: Under 0.2 seconds; claimed 99.99% accuracy | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart door lock | Connectivity | Unlock methods | Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| LOCKSTAR Smart Keyless Entry D | Wi-Fi; gateway included | — | — |
| Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door | — | Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key; Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | — |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Fingerprint, PIN code, app, Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | Fingerprint, app, passcode, backup key, Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | Built-in Wi-Fi | Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant | — |
| Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint | Wi-Fi | Fingerprint, keypad code, app, physical key | WLCKB2 |
| Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypa | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | — | DDL242X-1HW-L |
| Veise VE017G-H Wi-Fi Smart Dea | — | — | VE017G-H |
| Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Dead | Built-in Wi-Fi | — | BE489WBCEN622 |
| Yale Assure Lock 2 Wi-Fi Smart | 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | — | YRD410-WF1-BSP |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart L | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; Matter over Thread | — | — |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | Built-in Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only | App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant | DDL242X-1HW |
| Yamiry Fingerprint Keyless Ent | Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | App, password, fingerprint, key fob, physical key | YR05 |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Dea | — | App, fingerprint, PIN code, key, Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant | DDL240X-1HW-H2 |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | — | Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 Gateway, mechanical key | VE017 |
More Details on Our Top Picks
LOCKSTAR Smart Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Fingerprint, Keypad, App, Card, and Key Access
The LOCKSTAR is a good fit for households that want several ways to get inside without relying on a single phone or code. It combines fingerprint, keypad, card, app, and physical-key access, giving family members or visitors a choice of entry method. Its included Wi-Fi gateway supports app features such as event history and real-time alerts, while auto-lock helps reduce the chance of leaving the door unsecured. Compared with the Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door Lock, LOCKSTAR includes the gateway, so its remote features don’t depend on buying that accessory separately. The tradeoff is that remote functions still require app setup, and installation may call for drilling if the door has no existing lock hole. I’d choose it for access flexibility, not for the simplest installation.
Pros:- Five entry methods accommodate users who prefer different ways to unlock.
- Included Wi-Fi gateway supports app-based event history and real-time notifications.
- Auto-lock and manual keypad locking offer more than one way to secure the door.
- Installation accessories are included.
Cons:- Remote features require app setup.
- A door without an existing lock hole may need drilling.
- The supplied details do not specify a battery type or battery-life estimate.
Best for: Households with different entry preferences that want fingerprint, keypad, card, app, and key access in one deadbolt.
Not ideal for: Renters or homeowners who cannot drill their door and want an installation guaranteed to use existing holes.
- Brand and model:LOCKSTAR LS-SDL
- Lock type:Keypad deadbolt
- Access methods:App, fingerprint, keypad code, card fob, traditional key
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi; gateway included
- Additional features:Auto-lock, manual keypad locking, event history, real-time notifications
- Material and color:Zinc; black
- Dimensions and weight:1.18 x 2.64 x 6.46 inches; 16 ounces
Our verdict“Choose LOCKSTAR if your household values varied entry methods and included gateway access more than a potentially drill-free installation.”
Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad
Yamiry stands out for buyers who want biometric entry and a handle designed to fit either door swing without adding drilling to a typical installation. It supports fingerprint, passcode, key fob, mechanical key, and Bluetooth app access; the app also handles temporary codes and unlock records. The reversible handle helps this model accommodate left- or right-handed doors, while screwdriver installation is intended for most standard American wooden doors. Compared with the LOCKSTAR Smart Keyless Entry Deadbolt, Yamiry’s main advantage is its stated no-additional-drilling installation approach, but its remote control and Alexa unlocking require a Wi-Fi gateway sold separately. That makes it less ready for remote access out of the box. I’d pick it for a door-fit-friendly setup, but skip it if remote control is a must and you don’t want another component.
Pros:- Multiple entry options include fingerprint, passcode, fobs, and mechanical keys.
- App supports temporary access codes and unlock records.
- Reversible handle accommodates left- and right-handed doors.
- Designed for screwdriver installation without additional drilling on most standard American wooden doors.
Cons:- Remote control and Alexa unlocking require a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway.
- App access is described as Bluetooth, so remote functions depend on the extra gateway.
- The supplied details do not give a battery type or battery-life estimate.
Best for: Homeowners with a standard American wooden door who want fingerprint access, temporary app codes, and a reversible handle.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote locking or Alexa control immediately without purchasing a separate Wi-Fi gateway.
- Brand and model:Yamiry YR01
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key; Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- App functions:Temporary access codes and unlock records
- Installation:Screwdriver installation; designed for most standard American wooden doors
- Handle orientation:Reversible for left- or right-handed doors
- Included components:Exterior assembly, interior assembly, 2 key fobs, 2 mechanical keys, screw set, adjustable latch
- Recommended use:Indoor and exterior doors
Our verdict“Choose Yamiry for a flexible, screwdriver-installable fingerprint lock, but look elsewhere if you want built-in remote access.”
Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart Door Lock with Handle, Fingerprint and Keypad, Satin Nickel
This Philips 4200 Series is suited to buyers who want app-based remote access without adding a separate hub. Its 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi connection supports remote control, access history, and user management, while fingerprint, PIN, app, and voice-assistant entry give household members alternatives to a key. The reported 0.3-second fingerprint unlock and adjustable auto-lock delay make everyday entry and door security easier to tailor. A matching handle set is included, unlike the eufy Security Smart Lock C220, which is a deadbolt-focused choice with Apple Watch access and an IP53 rating. Philips is a better match for shoppers replacing a lock and handle together, but its eight AA batteries are not included and it only connects to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. Check both details before buying.
Pros:- Direct 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi enables remote app control and access management without a hub.
- Fingerprint, PIN, app, Alexa, and Google Assistant provide varied entry options.
- Matching door levers are included with the lock.
- Auto-lock delay can be adjusted from 0 to 180 seconds.
Cons:- Eight AA alkaline batteries are required and not included.
- Connects to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only.
- The listed compatible door thickness is limited to 1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches.
Best for: Homeowners replacing a deadbolt and handle together who want remote app access without a separate hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers whose router setup lacks 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi or who prefer a lock that includes its required batteries.
- Brand and model:Philips DDL242X-1HW
- Finish:Satin nickel
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, PIN code, app, Alexa, Google Assistant
- Fingerprint unlock time:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock delay:0–180 seconds
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/8 to 1-3/4 inches (38–50 mm)
- Power and included components:8 AA alkaline batteries, not included; smart lock, two door levers, latch assembly, mounting hardware, user manual
Our verdict“Choose this Philips model if you need a complete lock-and-handle set with direct Wi-Fi, and can accommodate its battery and network requirements.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Front Door Lock Set with Fingerprint Keypad and Handle
For households that regularly share access with guests, cleaners, or short-term visitors, this Philips set offers a standout capacity of up to 100 time-sensitive passcodes. Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi supports remote locking, unlocking, status checks, and app-based access management, while fingerprint, passcode, key, app, and voice control cover everyday entry. The set includes a handle and two backup keys, and its IP53 water-resistance rating adds a useful layer for a front-door installation. Compared with the Philips 4200 Series WiFi Smart Door Lock, this model specifies a wider compatible door-thickness range and four AA batteries rather than eight. It still shares the 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi limitation, and its batteries are not included. I’d favor it when temporary-code capacity matters more than broader network compatibility.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 time-sensitive passcodes for visitors and service access.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control and status checks without a separately listed gateway.
- Fingerprint, app, passcode, key, and voice control provide several entry choices.
- Includes a matching handle and two backup keys, with IP53 water resistance.
Cons:- Four AA batteries are required and not included.
- Wi-Fi connectivity is limited to 2.4 GHz.
- Voice control depends on Alexa or Google Assistant compatibility and setup.
Best for: Households that issue time-limited codes to frequent guests or service providers and want remote access management.
Not ideal for: Buyers whose Wi-Fi setup does not support 2.4 GHz or who want a lock supplied with batteries.
- Brand and model:Philips DDL242X-1HW-H-NEW
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, passcode, backup key, Alexa, Google Assistant
- Fingerprint unlock speed:0.3 seconds
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 time-sensitive codes
- Auto-lock timer:10–180 seconds
- Door compatibility:Door thickness: 1-3/8 to 2 inches; cross-bore: 1-1/2 or 2-1/8 inches
- Power and water resistance:4 AA batteries, not included; IP53
- Included components:Exterior handle, interior lever, smart lock, 2 keys
Our verdict“Choose this Philips set if you need many temporary guest codes and remote access, provided 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi suits your home.”
eufy Security Smart Lock C220 Fingerprint Keyless Entry Deadbolt
The eufy C220 suits buyers who want a deadbolt with broad entry choices and remote access built in. It supports six unlocking methods, including fingerprint, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and voice control, while built-in Wi-Fi avoids the separate gateway required for remote access on the Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door Lock. Its stated battery life is up to eight months from eight AA batteries, and the IP53 rating and BHMA Grade 3 certification provide useful environmental and hardware context. The compromise is a relatively substantial battery requirement, with actual life varying by use. Its Apple Watch option may appeal to users already in that ecosystem, but buyers who want a matching handle set should compare it with either Philips lock-and-handle option. This is the strongest fit here for varied connected entry on a deadbolt.
Pros:- Six unlocking methods include Apple Watch and a physical key.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote access without a separate bridge.
- Rated for up to eight months of use on eight AA batteries.
- IP53 water resistance and BHMA Grade 3 certification are specified.
Cons:- Requires eight AA batteries, and battery life varies with usage.
- Does not list a matching handle set among the included components.
- Remote features rely on Wi-Fi availability.
Best for: Smart-home users who want built-in remote access plus fingerprint, keypad, physical-key, Apple Watch, and voice-control entry.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking a matching handle set or a lock with a lower stated battery count.
- Brand and model:eufy Security T8506
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Battery:8 AA batteries; up to 8 months
- Water resistance and certification:IP53; BHMA Grade 3
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F (-30°C to 70°C)
- Installation:About 15 minutes; compatible with most standard deadbolts
- Included components:2 keys, 8 AA batteries, exterior and interior assemblies, installation set, mounting plate
Our verdict“Choose the eufy C220 if you want a deadbolt with built-in Wi-Fi and diverse smart-device access, and are comfortable managing eight AA batteries.”
Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt
The Wyze Lock Bolt v2 is a strong fit for households that want a choice at the door: fingerprint, keypad code, app, or a physical key. Its built-in Wi-Fi supports remote management without a separate gateway, while capacity for up to 50 fingerprints or codes gives families and regular visitors room to have individual access. Compared with the Schlage Encode, Wyze emphasizes biometric entry and offers USB-C emergency power; Schlage instead holds up to 100 codes and includes its batteries. Wyze’s tradeoffs are its need for eight AA batteries and the possibility that fingerprint recognition may not work consistently for every user. I’d choose it for flexible everyday entry, but not for buyers who want the largest code capacity or a simpler battery setup.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, keypad, app, and physical-key entry.
- Built-in Wi-Fi allows remote lock management.
- Stores up to 50 codes or fingerprints.
- USB-C emergency power provides an option if the batteries run down.
Cons:- Requires eight AA batteries.
- Fingerprint entry depends on the scanner recognizing the user.
- Battery life is listed as up to eight months, so replacements may be needed more often than once a year.
Best for: Households that want fingerprint entry plus app, keypad, and key access, with room for multiple household members’ codes or prints.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a large access-code roster or prefer not to manage eight AA batteries and fingerprint recognition.
- Model:WLCKB2
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, keypad code, app, physical key
- Stored codes or fingerprints:Up to 50
- Battery life:Up to 8 months
- Batteries:8 AA
- Emergency power:USB-C
- Weather resistance:IP53
- Durability certification:BHMA 2
Our verdict“Choose Wyze if you want several ways to unlock and emergency USB-C power; choose Schlage Encode if a larger code capacity matters more.”
Philips 4200 Series WiFi Keypad Deadbolt with Handle
The Philips 4200 Series makes sense for buyers replacing both a deadbolt and door levers, since the matching handle set and installation hardware are included. It connects directly to 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi, so remote app control and voice-assistant support do not call for a separate hub. Fingerprint entry is rated at 0.3 seconds, while permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring PINs give owners more tailored ways to share access than a basic keypad lock. Compared with the Veise VE017G-H, Philips lists a wider range of PIN schedules, while Veise includes cards and backup keys and supports doors up to two inches thick. Philips fits doors up to 1 3/4 inches, and its batteries are not included. Buyers must also enable auto-lock in the app.
Pros:- Includes a deadbolt, two matching levers, and installation hardware.
- Supports fingerprint entry and four PIN types, including one-time and recurring codes.
- Connects to Wi-Fi without a hub and works with Alexa and Google Assistant.
- App offers remote control, access history, and adjustable auto-lock.
Cons:- Batteries are not included.
- Requires 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and should be within 33 feet of the router.
- Auto-lock is off by default and must be enabled in the app.
Best for: Homeowners replacing a deadbolt and matching levers together who want fingerprint entry, scheduled PIN access, and app control.
Not ideal for: People with doors thicker than 1 3/4 inches, no reliable 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi nearby, or a preference for included batteries and default-on auto-lock.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW-L
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Entry methods:Fingerprint and PIN code
- PIN code types:Permanent, one-time, periodic, and recurring
- Fingerprint unlock time:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock delay:0–180 seconds
- Battery life:Up to 6 months
- Door thickness:1 3/8–1 3/4 inches (38–50 mm)
- Voice assistants:Alexa and Google Assistant
Our verdict“Pick the Philips 4200 if you need a matched handle set and flexible PIN scheduling, but check your door thickness and Wi-Fi placement first.”
Veise VE017G-H Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Handle Set, Matte Black
For a busy household that shares access with guests, helpers, or tenants, the Veise VE017G-H offers an unusually broad mix of entry methods: fingerprint, app, codes, cards, voice control, and backup keys. Its listed capacity of 100+ customized codes and unlimited one-time codes gives it more room for rotating visitors than the Wyze Lock Bolt v2, which stores up to 50 codes or fingerprints. Veise also includes a gateway and complete handle set, making it a more bundled choice than the Schlage Encode, which is a deadbolt rather than a matching handleset package. The tradeoffs are that its four AA batteries are not included and fingerprint storage is listed as 20+ prints, a smaller pool than its code capacity suggests. Its door fit is broad, but buyers should confirm their setup matches a standard US door.
Pros:- Supports fingerprint, app, codes, cards, voice, and physical-key access.
- Provides 100+ customized codes and unlimited one-time codes.
- Includes a gateway, handleset, two keys, and two IC cards.
- Fits left- or right-handed standard US doors from 1 3/8 to 2 inches thick.
Cons:- Four AA batteries are required and not included.
- Fingerprint capacity is listed as 20+ prints, well below its code capacity.
- Battery life is listed as up to 300+ days, requiring periodic replacement.
Best for: Households, rental hosts, or small property managers who need many individual codes and several ways to grant access.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need fingerprint profiles for a large group, want batteries included, or prefer a lock from a brand with a clearer track record in their home setup.
- Model:VE017G-H
- Finish:Matte black
- Access methods:Voice, fingerprint, app, codes, cards, backup key, user authorization, code sharing
- Fingerprint capacity:20+ fingerprints
- Code capacity:100+ customized codes; unlimited one-time codes
- Auto-lock timer:0–180 seconds
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included; up to 300+ days
- Door compatibility:Standard US doors, 1 3/8–2 inches thick; left- or right-handed
- Warranty:1-year limited; extendable by 1 year with registration
Our verdict“Choose Veise for a bundled handleset and extensive code sharing; choose Wyze if fingerprint capacity is more central to your household.”
Schlage Encode WiFi Smart Deadbolt with Century Trim, Matte Black
The Schlage Encode is the most straightforward pick here for owners who prioritize managing many keypad users. Its built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without a hub, and it supports up to 100 access codes plus lock history and customizable notifications. Compared with the Wyze Lock Bolt v2, Schlage trades fingerprint unlocking and USB-C emergency power for twice the stated code capacity, an included set of four AA batteries, and a touchscreen keypad designed to resist fingerprints. An alarm adds another layer of notice around the door, while Alexa and Google Home support can fit an existing smart-home setup. The cost of that simplicity is fewer entry methods: it has no listed fingerprint or card access. Battery life is up to six months, and remote features depend on secure Wi-Fi and app pairing.
Pros:- Manages up to 100 access codes and provides lock history.
- Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote access without a separate hub.
- Includes a customizable alarm, touchscreen keypad, and physical backup key.
- Four AA batteries are included.
Cons:- Does not list fingerprint or card entry.
- Battery life is up to six months with typical use.
- Remote and voice features require secure Wi-Fi and app pairing.
Best for: Families or property owners who issue many keypad codes and want remote access history, alerts, and a physical key backup.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want fingerprint or card entry, USB-C emergency power, or a longer stated interval between battery changes.
- Model:BE489WBCEN622
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Access codes:Up to 100
- Voice assistants:Amazon Alexa and Google Home
- Door thickness:1 3/8–1 3/4 inches
- Backset:2 3/8 or 2 3/4 inches
- Power:Four AA batteries, included
- Battery life:Up to 6 months with typical use
- Warranty:Limited lifetime mechanical and finish; limited 3-year electronics
Our verdict“Pick the Schlage Encode if code capacity and straightforward remote monitoring matter more than biometric entry.”
Yale Assure Lock 2 Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt with Keypad, Black Suede
The Yale Assure Lock 2 suits buyers who want the door to respond to their arrival, not just a code entered at the keypad. Its listed entry options include smartphone, Apple Watch, and hands-free auto-unlock, while DoorSense can report whether the door is open or closed. Direct 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi connects it to the Yale Access app without a hub, and scheduled codes with expiration dates are useful for recurring or temporary access. Compared with the Schlage Encode, Yale adds auto-unlock, Apple Watch access, and DoorSense; Schlage offers a stated capacity of up to 100 codes and includes four AA batteries. Yale’s product data lists unlimited scheduled codes but not a numeric keypad-code capacity, so buyers who need a defined large roster may prefer Schlage. App control is listed for the US and Canada only.
Pros:- Hands-free auto-unlock adds convenience when arriving with bags or children.
- DoorSense reports whether the door is open or closed.
- Supports scheduled codes with expiration dates and real-time app alerts.
- Connects directly to 2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi without a hub.
Cons:- App control is listed for the US and Canada only.
- Product data does not specify a numeric keypad-code capacity.
- Fits doors 1 3/4 to 2 1/4 inches thick, so it may not suit thinner doors.
Best for: People who often arrive with their hands full and want app alerts, hands-free auto-unlock, and scheduled access for visitors.
Not ideal for: Buyers outside the US or Canada, or those who need a clearly specified high number of keypad codes before choosing.
- Model:YRD410-WF1-BSP
- Connectivity:2.4 or 5 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Entry methods:Keypad, smartphone, Apple Watch, auto-unlock, backup key
- Code access:Unlimited scheduled access codes
- Door compatibility:1 3/4–2 1/4 inches thick; 2 1/8-inch bore hole
- Security certification:BHMA Grade 2
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 140°F
- Warranty:Limited lifetime on finish and mechanical; 1 year on electronics
Our verdict“Choose Yale for hands-free arrival and DoorSense feedback, but favor Schlage Encode if you need a clearly stated 100-code capacity.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Matter over Thread
The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE fits households that want a choice of ways to get inside: fingerprint, passcode, app, shared eKey, voice, or a traditional key. Built-in Wi-Fi supports remote control without a hub, while Matter over Thread offers another smart-home route if you already have a compatible hub. That flexibility gives it an edge over the Bluetooth-based Yamiry Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Door Knob Lock, which needs a separately sold gateway for remote access. The tradeoff is that Matter features still depend on extra hardware, and this lock only supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi. Its IP65 rating suits exposed exterior doors, but a door sensor is not included, so you won’t get a separate signal confirming whether the door itself is open.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, passcode, app, web, shared eKey, voice, and physical-key access.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control without a hub.
- IP65 water resistance suits exterior-door exposure.
- Advertised battery life is up to 18 months.
Cons:- Matter over Thread features require a compatible hub.
- Wi-Fi is limited to 2.4 GHz.
- A door sensor is not included.
Best for: Households that want fingerprint and shared-code entry, built-in remote access, and the option to connect through Matter with a compatible hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking Matter connectivity without adding a hub, 5 GHz Wi-Fi support, or a door sensor in the box.
- Access methods:Fingerprint, passcode, smartphone app, web portal, shared eKey or code, voice control, mechanical keys
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50
- Passcode capacity:Up to 50
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; Matter over Thread
- Matter hub:Compatible Matter over Thread hub required
- Battery life:Up to 18 months
- Water resistance:IP65
- Material:Zinc alloy
- Warranty:Lifetime mechanical; 18-month electronic
Our verdict“Choose the Bolt SE if you want varied entry methods and built-in remote control, and can accept a separate hub for Matter features.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Keyless Entry
The Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt is a practical fit for homes that regularly issue codes to guests, cleaners, or other visitors. Its support for up to 100 custom passcodes, including scheduled or one-time codes, gives it more room for distinct access than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, which holds up to 50 passcodes. Built-in Wi-Fi also enables remote app control without a hub, and access history, alerts, Away Mode, and adjustable auto-lock settings help owners keep track of entry without relying on fingerprints. The Philips is less flexible at the door than the ULTRALOQ, which adds shared eKeys and web access. Check door thickness before buying: this model fits 1-3/8 to 2-inch doors. Batteries are not included, and neither is a door sensor.
Pros:- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes, including scheduled or one-time codes.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote access without a hub.
- Combines access alerts and history with Away Mode and adjustable auto-lock.
- Provides app, passcode, fingerprint, physical-key, Alexa, and Google Assistant access.
Cons:- AA batteries are not included.
- Supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only.
- Does not include a door sensor.
Best for: Homeowners who issue separate guest, service, or household codes and want remote app access without a hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers whose doors fall outside the 1-3/8 to 2-inch fit range, or who want an included door sensor or supplied batteries.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa, Google Assistant
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi; 2.4 GHz only
- Hub required:No
- Maximum custom passcodes:100
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Compatible door thickness:1-3/8 to 2 inches (38–50 mm)
- Batteries:AA alkaline (LR6); not included
- Door sensor:Not included
Our verdict“Pick this Philips if you need many distinct access codes and hub-free remote control, provided your door matches its thickness range.”
Yamiry Fingerprint Keyless Entry Smart Door Knob Lock
The Yamiry YR05 keeps the setup straightforward for buyers who mainly want keyless entry at the door. It offers fingerprint, password, app, key-fob, and physical-key access, and its included fobs and keys give household members alternatives if they don’t want to use the app. Installation is designed for a screwdriver, and auto-lock can reduce the chance of leaving the door unsecured. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, however, the Yamiry doesn’t have built-in Wi-Fi for remote control: it connects by Bluetooth, and remote access requires a separately sold gateway. That makes it a better match for local use than for managing access while away. It is also a knob-style lock rather than a deadbolt, so buyers should confirm the lock type and fit their door needs before choosing it.
Pros:- Provides five entry methods, including fingerprint, key fob, and physical key.
- Includes two physical keys and two key fobs.
- Supports auto-lock and app control over Bluetooth.
- Designed for screwdriver installation on most American standard doors.
Cons:- Remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway.
- Bluetooth connectivity does not provide built-in Wi-Fi access.
- Listed product coverage is one year.
Best for: Renters or homeowners seeking a straightforward Bluetooth lock with fingerprint entry, included fobs, and physical keys for local access.
Not ideal for: People who need remote access out of the box, prefer a deadbolt, or don’t want to purchase a separate Wi-Fi gateway.
- Model:YR05
- Material:Aluminum
- Unlock methods:App, password, fingerprint, key fob, physical key
- Capacity:Up to 50 passwords and fingerprints
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Door compatibility:Most American standard doors
- Dimensions:5.62 x 2.69 x 3 inches
- Weight:1.18 kg
- Warranty:1-year product coverage
Our verdict“Choose the Yamiry for local fingerprint and fob access at a simple setup, but look to the Philips Wi-Fi deadbolt for built-in remote control.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Keypad Deadbolt Lock Set with Handles
The Philips DDL240X-1HW-H2 makes sense when replacing the deadbolt and handle together: its matching handle set comes in the package, along with four batteries. That gives it a more complete hardware setup than the standalone Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, which doesn’t include a handle set and also requires buyers to supply batteries. The lock supports fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and voice-assistant access, plus remote status monitoring, notifications, guest codes, and automatic locking. Up to 100 user codes and unlimited one-time PINs give hosts room to assign separate entry credentials. The tradeoff is fit: this set is specified for doors 35–50 mm thick, so measure before ordering. Remote features also depend on Wi-Fi and the Philips app, rather than working as an entirely offline setup.
Pros:- Includes a matching handle set and four batteries.
- Offers fingerprint, PIN, key, app, and voice-assistant access.
- Supports up to 100 user codes and unlimited one-time PINs.
- Provides remote status monitoring, notifications, and automatic locking.
Cons:- Fits only doors 35–50 mm thick.
- Remote control and notifications depend on Wi-Fi and the Philips app.
Best for: Homeowners replacing both a deadbolt and handle who want fingerprint entry, guest PINs, app monitoring, and batteries included.
Not ideal for: Buyers replacing only a deadbolt, those with doors outside the 35–50 mm range, or anyone avoiding app- and Wi-Fi-dependent remote features.
- Model:DDL240X-1HW-H2
- Unlock methods:App, fingerprint, PIN code, key, Amazon Alexa or Google Assistant
- User codes:Up to 100 user codes and unlimited one-time PIN codes
- Auto-lock timer:30–180 seconds
- Compatible door thickness:35–50 mm
- Included components:Door lock, handle set, 4 batteries
- Recommended use:Home
Our verdict“Choose this Philips set when you need a coordinated handle-and-deadbolt replacement with guest codes and included batteries.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Matte Black
The Veise VE017 brings together fingerprint, keypad, fob-card, app, and mechanical-key access, while storing access data on the lock with AES-128 encryption. For buyers who prefer entry information kept locally, that is a useful distinction from the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, whose strongest advantage is hub-free remote app control. The Veise supports remote user management, temporary codes, and entry logs through the KK Home app, but its smart-home and voice features require the separately sold G1 Gateway. Its four AA batteries are not included, and the claimed battery life and fingerprint figures are manufacturer specifications rather than independent guarantees. The lock also has an emergency USB-C power port and is designed for DIY installation, giving owners a fallback if batteries run low and a simpler route to fitting it themselves.
Pros:- Offers fingerprint, app, keypad, fob-card, code-sharing, and mechanical-key access.
- Stores access data on the lock with AES-128 encryption.
- Supports remote user permissions, temporary codes, and entry logs through the app.
- Includes an emergency USB-C power port and is designed for screwdriver installation.
Cons:- Four AA batteries are required and not included.
- The G1 Gateway is sold separately for remote access and voice-assistant features.
- Battery-life and fingerprint-performance figures are manufacturer claims.
Best for: DIY-minded homeowners who want several entry methods, locally stored access data, and optional remote management through an added gateway.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want remote access or voice-assistant integration without extra hardware, or who expect batteries to be included.
- Model:VE017
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 Gateway, mechanical key
- Fingerprint recognition:Under 0.2 seconds; claimed 99.99% accuracy
- Auto-lock delay:0–180 seconds
- Battery:4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries; not included
- Claimed battery life:About 12 months; varies with use
- Data security:AES-128 encryption; data stored on the lock
- Emergency power:USB-C port
- Water resistance:IP55
Our verdict“Pick the VE017 if local data storage and multiple entry methods matter more than built-in remote access without extra hardware.”
How We Picked
I compared these locks on the features that change daily ownership: available entry methods, remote connectivity, smart-home compatibility, installation format, and the amount of hardware included. A fingerprint reader or keypad is useful only if it fits how residents and guests enter; Wi-Fi matters most to people who want remote control or status checks away from home. I also treated a complete handle set differently from a deadbolt-only replacement, since buyers may be solving different hardware problems.
The ranking favors products with a clear role and a useful balance of access options, connectivity, and installation flexibility. The Schlage Encode leads as a broadly practical Wi-Fi deadbolt; eufy and Wyze offer strong fingerprint-focused alternatives, and ULTRALOQ earns a distinct place for Matter over Thread. Philips, Veise, Yamiry, and LOCKSTAR models offer several combinations of handles, keypads, fingerprints, and keys, but their relative fit depends more on the exact door and desired access method. I would confirm door measurements, lock compatibility, network requirements, and smart-home support before treating any feature list as a guarantee of fit.
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Smart Door Locks
Smart locks differ most in how they fit into a home’s entry routine, not in how long their feature lists are. I would start with the door and the people using it, then decide how much remote control or smart-home integration is worth adding.
Choose the lock format before the access method
Decide whether you are replacing a deadbolt, a knob, or both before comparing fingerprint readers and apps. A deadbolt-only lock can be a straightforward swap when the existing knob and trim are staying, while a handle bundle may make more sense during a broader hardware refresh. Check the door’s thickness, bore hole, backset, and handing against the product requirements; a smart lock can have the right features and still be the wrong fit. Another common mistake is assuming a matching-looking handle set will reuse every existing hole or latch. If you rent or want to limit changes, prioritize a compatible replacement that preserves the door’s current preparation. Treat included handles as a convenience, not proof of universal fit.
Match entry methods to the people who use the door
Keypads work well for shared households, temporary visitors, and anyone who does not want to rely on a phone. Fingerprint entry can make frequent arrivals quicker, but it may be less suitable as the sole method for children, guests, or people whose fingerprints are difficult for a reader to recognize. A physical key provides a fallback, though it does not help if the key is left inside or lost. Multiple entry methods offer flexibility, but they can also add setup and maintenance work. Decide who needs access, how often codes will change, and whether a backup method is necessary before paying for extra features. The best routine is one every household member can use reliably.
Separate local access from remote control
A keypad or fingerprint reader may let someone unlock the door locally without giving you control from elsewhere. Remote locking, guest-code management, and status checks depend on the lock’s connectivity and app support. Built-in Wi-Fi can reduce reliance on a separate bridge, though it makes network compatibility and battery upkeep worth checking. Thread-based options such as Matter over Thread call for a compatible smart-home setup; the standard alone does not mean every phone can control the lock directly. Before buying, list the remote actions you actually need and check whether they require a hub, account, or supported controller. If you only want keyless entry at the door, paying extra for remote features may bring little benefit.
Check smart-home compatibility by task, not logo
Compatibility can mean different things: voice control, app-based status, automation, or guest access may each have separate requirements. Confirm the exact lock model works with the platform you use and supports the particular task you want, rather than relying on a broad claim of smart-home compatibility. Matter can help connect devices across supported ecosystems, but a Matter-over-Thread lock still needs the right Thread border router and controller. If the lock is part of an existing routine, check whether it can trigger or respond to that routine. Also consider what happens if the internet or home network is unavailable; local keypad or fingerprint entry may still matter even when remote control does not. Compatibility details can change, so verify current support before purchase.
Plan for batteries, app access, and backup entry
Every electronic lock needs a plan for depleted batteries, app changes, and forgotten access codes. Check the manufacturer’s instructions for low-battery warnings and emergency entry, then keep a backup method available rather than waiting for a problem. Wi-Fi use, frequent motor operation, and environmental conditions can affect battery life, so advertised estimates are not a substitute for a maintenance routine. If several people manage access, decide who owns the account and how codes will be removed when a guest no longer needs entry. A physical key can be useful, but only if it is stored somewhere accessible outside the locked home. Small ownership details often matter more after installation than another feature on the spec sheet.
Pay for the features that solve a real household problem
A higher-feature lock makes sense when its added connectivity, entry methods, or included hardware will see regular use. Remote access may be worthwhile for households managing deliveries or visitors, while a simple keypad could be enough for someone who mainly wants to stop carrying keys. Fingerprint access is most persuasive when the same residents use the door often and want a fast local unlock. Handle bundles can save coordination work when replacing both pieces of hardware, but they are unnecessary if the existing knob is staying. Avoid choosing by the number of unlocking options alone: each method can add configuration and maintenance. Compare the complete setup you need, including any hub or compatible smart-home equipment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a Wi-Fi smart lock if I mainly want to enter with a keypad?
No. A keypad can provide keyless entry at the door without remote access, so a Wi-Fi model may be more than you need. Wi-Fi becomes useful if you want to manage access or check lock status while away, subject to the model’s app and network requirements. Some smart-home functions may need a hub or compatible controller even when the lock has wireless connectivity. Choose based on the tasks you expect to use, not on the assumption that every smart lock needs internet access.
Will a smart deadbolt work with my existing door and handle?
It may, but the lock format and door preparation need to match. Check the required door thickness, backset, bore hole, and latch arrangement against your door before ordering. A deadbolt-only model usually leaves the knob or lever in place, while a handle set may replace more hardware and require additional compatibility checks. Do not assume a product’s finish or bundled parts mean it will fit your existing holes. If your door has unusual dimensions or a multipoint system, confirm compatibility with the manufacturer first.
Is a fingerprint lock a good choice for a household with guests or children?
It can be convenient for regular residents, but I would not make fingerprints the only way in when many different people need access. A keypad can make temporary or shared access easier because guests do not need to enroll a fingerprint. Keep a backup entry method for anyone whose fingerprint the reader has trouble recognizing, and check how the lock handles user enrollment and removal. For a household with frequent visitors, a model that combines fingerprint access with a keypad or key offers more options. The right mix depends on who enters regularly and how much access administration you want to handle.
Does Matter over Thread mean I can control a lock without a hub?
Not necessarily. Matter over Thread depends on compatible smart-home equipment, including the required Thread network support, to connect the lock to the system you use. It does not automatically mean that a phone can communicate with the lock directly or that every platform supports every feature. Check the lock’s current compatibility details and the equipment already in your home before choosing it for an automation. If you want the simplest remote setup, compare that requirement with a built-in Wi-Fi model. A Thread-based choice can suit an established smart home, but it is not always the easiest first connected lock.
Should I choose a lock that includes a handle set?
Choose a handle bundle when you are replacing both the deadbolt and the matching knob or lever, or when coordinated hardware matters to your project. If your existing handle works and you only need keyless deadbolt access, a deadbolt-only option can avoid replacing usable hardware. Bundles still need to match the door’s dimensions, handing, latch, and installation layout, so check those details before buying. Also confirm whether the included handle is the style you want and whether the package replaces all the hardware you plan to change. The added pieces are useful only when they fit the job you are doing.
Conclusion
For most shoppers who want a capable connected deadbolt, I would start with the Schlage Encode as my best overall pick. The best value direction is a simpler keypad or fingerprint model that matches your door and access routine, rather than paying for remote features you will not use. For a premium smart-home setup, consider the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE if you already have compatible Matter-over-Thread equipment. For beginners, a straightforward keypad deadbolt with familiar backup access is easier to live with than a setup that depends on extra network hardware. If fingerprint entry is your priority, compare the eufy C220, Wyze Lock Bolt v2, and Philips fingerprint options; if you need replacement handles too, focus on the handle-set models and verify fit first. My final choice would come down to door compatibility, the access methods your household will use, and whether remote control is worth the added setup.
Cold & flu season Picks
humidifiers
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
